Geography, planning and design

When freely available, you can download the publication by clicking on the image on the left

Geography

Fellow: Edwin Buitelaar

Buitelaar, E., Weterings, A., & Ponds, R. (2017). Cities, economic inequality and justice: Reflections and alternative perspectives. Routledge.

Fellows: Edwin Buitelaar, Stefano Moroni, Anita De Franco

Buitelaar, E., Moroni, S., & De Franco, A. (2021). Building obsolescence in the evolving city. Reframing property vacancy and abandonment in the light of urban dynamics and complexity. Cities108, 102964.


Fellow: Giancarlo Cotella

Cotella, G. (2020). How Europe hits home? The impact of European Union policies on territorial governance and spatial planning. Géocarrefour94(94/3).


Fellow: Anita De Franco

De Franco, A. (2022). Abandonment as a social fact: the problem of unused and unmaintained private buildings in a neo-institutional perspective. Cham: Springer.

Fellows: Anita De Franco, Stefano Moroni

De Franco, A., & Moroni, S. (2023). The city as an information system: Urban agency, experiential inputs and planning measures. Cities134, 104183.

Fellows: Anita De Franco, Carolina Pacchi

De Franco, A., & Pacchi, C. (2024). The space of rules and rules of space: reflecting on local ordinances during the Covid-19 pandemic. City, Territory and Architecture11(1), 16.


Fellow: Mathias Jehling

Banon, F., & Jehling, M. (2020). Looking for innovation–Trajectories of land transaction and readjustment in West Africa. Cities106, 102880.


Fellows: Stefano Moroni, Anita De Franco

Moroni, S., De Franco, A., & Bellè, B. M. (2020). Unused private and public buildings: Re-discussing merely empty and truly abandoned situations, with particular reference to the case of Italy and the city of Milan. Journal of Urban Affairs42(8), 1299-1320.


​Fellow: Federico Savini

Savini, F. (2016). Self‐organization and urban development: Disaggregating the city‐region, deconstructing urbanity in Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40(6), 1152-1169.


Fellows: Thomas Thaler, Thomas Hartmann

Thaler, T., Doorn, N., & Hartmann, T. (2020). Justice of compensation for spatial flood risk management–comparing the flexible Austrian and the structured Dutch approach. DIE ERDE–Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin151(2-3), 104-115.

Planning laws and institutions


Fellow: Rachelle Alterman

Alterman, R., & Pellach, C. (Eds.). (2020). Regulating coastal zones: International perspectives on land management instruments. Routledge.

Alterman, R., & Calor, I. (2020). Between informal and illegal in the Global North: Planning law, enforcement, and justifiable noncompliance. In U. Grashoff (Ed.) Comparative Approaches to Informal Housing.around the Globe (pp. 150-185). University College London (UCL) Press


Fellow: Francesco Chiodelli

Chiodelli, F., Coppola, A., Belotti, E., Berruti, G., Marinaro, I. C., Curci, F., & Zanfi, F. (2021). The production of informal space: A critical atlas of housing informalities in Italy between public institutions and political strategies. Progress in Planning149, 100495.

Fellows: Francesco Chiodelli, Stefano Moroni

Chiodelli, F., & Moroni, S. (2014). The complex nexus between informality and the law: Reconsidering unauthorised settlements in light of the concept of nomotropism. Geoforum51, 161-168.


​Fellows: Giancarlo Cotella, Umberto Janin Rivolin

Cotella, G., & Rivolin, U. J. (Eds.). (2025). Handbook of Territorial Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U., & Solly, A. (2021). Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development: a European typology. European planning studies29(1), 181-200.


Fellows: Sebastian Dembski, Willem Salet

Dembski, S., & Salet, W. (2010). The transformative potential of institutions: How symbolic markers can institute new social meaning in changing cities. Environment and planning A42(3), 611-625.


Fellow: Umberto Janin Rivolin

Janin Rivolin, U. (2025). Notes on the comparison of territorial governance systems. In A Gentleman Planner. Scritti in memoria di Luigi Mazza (pp. 129-142). Franco Angeli.

Janin Rivolin, U. (2017). Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: a European comparison. European Planning Studies25(6), 994-1012.

Janin Rivolin, U. (2012). Planning systems as institutional technologies: a proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison. Planning Practice and Research27(1), 63-85.


Fellow: Mick Lennon

Lennon, M., & Kamjou, E. (2025). Epistemic injustice in planning: a framework for identifying degrees of harm. Local Environment30(1), 98-115.


​Fellow: Raine Mäntysalo

Mäntysalo, R., Jarenko, K., Nilsson, K. L., & Saglie, I. L. (2015). Legitimacy of informal strategic urban planning—Observations from Finland, Sweden and Norway. European Planning Studies23(2), 349-366.


​Fellows: Stefano Moroni, Edwin Buitelaar, Stefano Cozzolino

Moroni, S., Buitelaar, E., Sorel, N., & Cozzolino, S. (2020). Simple planning rules for complex urban problems: Toward legal certainty for spatial flexibility. Journal of Planning Education and Research40(3), 320-331.


Fellow: Federico Savini

Savini, F. (2016). Don’t blame public law: The legal articulation of certainty in Amsterdam land-use planning. Town Planning Review87(4), 459-479.


Fellow: Sina Shahab

Shahab, S., & Viallon, F. X. (2021). Swiss land improvement syndicates:‘Impure’Coasian solutions?. Planning Theory20(1), 44-62.

Planning theory


​Fellow: Rachelle Alterman

Alterman, R. (2017). Linking Planning Theory, Implementation Analysis and Planning Law: Planners’ Beacon, Compass and Scale. Encounters in Planning Thought16.


​Fellow: Claudia Basta

Basta, C. (2017). On Marx’s human significance, Harvey’s right to the city, and Nussbaum’s capability approach. Planning Theory16(4), 345-363.

Basta, C. (2016). From justice in planning toward planning for justice: A capability approach. Planning Theory15(2), 190-212.


Fellow: Edwin Buitelaar

Buitelaar, E. (2020). If neoliberalism is everything, maybe it is nothing. Planning Theory19(4), 485-488.


Fellow: Angelique Chettiparamb

Chettiparamb, A. (2019). Responding to a complex world: Explorations in spatial planning. Planning theory18(4), 429-447.

Chettiparamb, A. (2018). Meta-operations, autopoiesis and neo-systems thinking: What significance for spatial planners?. Planning Theory17(4), 628-643.

Chettiparamb, A. (2016). Articulating ‘public interest’through complexity theory. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy34(7), 1284-1305.


Fellow: Giancarlo Cotella

Blanc, F., Cabrera, J. E., Cotella, G., García, A., & Sandoval, J. C. (2022). Does planning keep its promises? Latin American spatial governance and planning as an ex-post regularisation activity. Planning Practice & Research37(6), 699-720.


Fellow: Sebastian Dembski

Dembski, S. (2020). ‘Organic’approaches to planning as densification strategy? The challenge of legal contextualisation in Buiksloterham, Amsterdam. Town Planning Review91(3), 283-303.

O’Brien, P., Lord, A., & Dembski, S. (2020). How do planners manage risk in alternative land development models? An institutional analysis of land development in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy91, 104409.


Fellow: José Miguel Fernández-Güell

Güell, J. M. F. (2019). Planificación estratégica de ciudades. Reverté.


​Fellow: Thomas Hartmann

Hartmann, T. (2012). Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: Planning as expectation management. Planning theory11(3), 242-256.


Fellow: Mick Lennon

Lennon, M., & Tubridy, F. (2023). ‘Time’as a focus for planning research: exploring temporalities of coastal change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning25(3), 301-313.


Fellow: Raine Mäntysalo

Puustinen, S., Mäntysalo, R., & Jarenko, K. (2017). The varying interpretations of public interest: Making sense of Finnish urban planners’ conceptions. Current Urban Studies5(1), 82-96.

Puustinen, S., Mäntysalo, R., Hytönen, J., & Jarenko, K. (2017). The “deliberative bureaucrat”: Deliberative democracy and institutional trust in the jurisdiction of the Finnish planner. Planning Theory & Practice18(1), 71-88.


Fellow: Hanna Mattila

Mattila, H. (2020). Habermas revisited: Resurrecting the contested roots of communicative planning theory. Progress in planning141, 100431.

Mattila, H. (2016). Can collaborative planning go beyond locally focused notions of the “public interest”? The potential of Habermas’ concept of “generalizable interest” in pluralist and trans-scalar planning discourses. Planning Theory15(4), 344-365.


Fellow: Stefano Moroni

Moroni, S. (2023). What can urban policies and planning really learn from John Rawls? A multi-strata view of institutional action and a canvas conception of the just city. Planning Theory22(4), 404-425.


Fellows: Stefano Moroni, Stefano Cozzolino

Moroni, S., & Cozzolino, S. (2019). Action and the city. Emergence, complexity, planning. Cities90(2019), 42-51.

Moroni, S., & Cozzolino, S. (2020). Conditions of actions in complex social–spatial systems. In Handbook on planning and complexity (pp. 186-202). Edward Elgar Publishing.


Fellows: Stefano Moroni, Giuseppe Lorini

Moroni, S., & Lorini, G. (2017). Graphic rules in planning: A critical exploration of normative drawings starting from zoning maps and form-based codes. Planning Theory16(3), 318-338.


Fellow: Camilla Perrone

de Roo, G., & Perrone, C. (2020). A multi-level rationality model for planning behaviour. In Handbook on planning and complexity (pp. 35-65). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Perrone, C. (2016). Grounds for future gendered urban agendas: policy patterns and practice implications. Town Planning Review87(5), 589-606.

Perrone, C. (2019). ‘Downtown Is for People’: The street-level approach in Jane Jacobs’ legacy and its resonance in the planning debate within the complexity theory of cities. Cities91, 10-16.


Fellow: Ward Rauws

Rauws, W. (2017). Embracing uncertainty without abandoning planning: Exploring an adaptive planning approach for guiding urban transformations. DisP-The Planning Review53(1), 32-45.

Rauws, W., & De Roo, G. (2016). Adaptive planning: Generating conditions for urban adaptability. Lessons from Dutch organic development strategies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design43(6), 1052-1074.


​Fellow: Federico Savini

Savini, F. (2019). Responsibility, polity, value: The (un) changing norms of planning practices. Planning Theory18(1), 58-81.

​Fellow: Federico Savini, Willem Salet

Savini, F., Majoor, S., & Salet, W. (2015). Dilemmas of planning: Intervention, regulation, and investment. Planning Theory14(3), 296-315.


Fellow: Sina Shahab

Shahab, S., Clinch, J. P., & O’Neill, E. (2018). Accounting for transaction costs in planning policy evaluation. Land Use Policy70, 263-272.

Shahab, S., Clinch, J. P., & O’Neill, E. (2019). Impact-based planning evaluation: Advancing normative criteria for policy analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science46(3), 534-550.


Fellow: Dominic Stead

Stead, D. (2021). Conceptualizing the policy tools of spatial planning. Journal of planning literature36(3), 297-311.

Purkarthofer, E., & Stead, D. (2023). Agency and structure in urban and regional planning: An illustrative overview and future research agenda. Journal of Planning Literature38(4), 571-587.

Davoudi, S., Galland, D., & Stead, D. (2020). Reinventing planning and planners: Ideological decontestations and rhetorical appeals. Planning Theory19(1), 17-37.


Fellow: Aleksandar D. Slaev

Slaev, A. D. (2020). Complex private-common property rights in institutional and planning theories. Planning Theory19(2), 193-213.

Slaev, A. D. (2016). Property rights and methods of nomocratic planning. Planning Theory15(3), 274-293.

Slaev, A. D. (2016). Types of planning and property rights. Planning Theory15(1), 23-41.


Fellows: Thomas Thaler

Thaler, T., Zischg, A., Keiler, M., & Fuchs, S. (2018). Allocation of risk and benefits—distributional justices in mountain hazard management. Regional environmental change18(2), 353-365.

Patterson, J. J., Thaler, T., Hoffmann, M., Hughes, S., Oels, A., Chu, E., … & Jordan, A. (2018). Political feasibility of 1.5 C societal transformations: the role of social justice. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability31, 1-9.

Urban design


Fellow: Paschalis Arvanitidis

Arvanitidis, P., & Nasioka, F. (2018). From commons dilemmas to social solutions: A common pool resource experiment in Greece. In Institutionalist Perspectives on Development: A Multidisciplinary Approach (pp. 125-142). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Arvanitidis, P. A., & Papagiannitsis, G. (2020). Urban open spaces as a commons: The credibility thesis and common property in a self-governed park of Athens, Greece. Cities97, 102480.


Fellow: Stefano Borgo

Melone, M. R. S., & Borgo, S. (2020). Rethinking rules and social practices. The design of urban spaces in the post-Covid-19 lockdown. TeMA-Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 333-341.


Fellows: Ian Carter, Stefano Moroni

Carter, I., & Moroni, S. (2022). Adaptive and anti-adaptive neighbourhoods: Investigating the relationship between individual choice and systemic adaptability. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science49(2), 722-736.


Fellow: Stefano Cozzolino

Cozzolino, S. (2020). The (anti) adaptive neighbourhoods. Embracing complexity and distribution of design control in the ordinary built environment. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science47(2), 203-219.


Fellows : Stefano Cozzolino, Stefano Moroni

Cozzolino, S., & Moroni, S. (2024). Action, property and beauty: planning with and for emergent urban complexity. Routledge.


Fellow: José Miguel Fernández-Güell

Fernández Güell, J. M. (2022). Complejidad e incertidumbre en la ciudad actual: Hacia un nuevo modelo conceptual. Edición: Jorge Sainz. Título de la serie: Estudios Universitarios de Arquitectura, (33).

Fernández-Güell, J. M., Collado-Lara, M., Guzmán-Arana, S., & Fernández-Anez, V. (2016). Incorporating a systemic and foresight approach into smart city initiatives: The case of Spanish cities. Journal of urban technology23(3), 43-67.


Fellow: Mathias Jehling

Israel, A., & Jehling, M. (2019). How modern are renewables? The misrecognition of traditional solar thermal energy in Peru’s energy transition. Energy Policy133, 110905.

Fellows: Thomas Hartmann, Mathias Jehling

Hartmann, T., & Jehling, M. (2019). From diversity to justice–Unraveling pluralistic rationalities in urban design. Cities91, 58-63.


Fellow: Mick Lennon

Lennon, M. (2017). Moral-material ontologies of nature conservation: exploring the discord between ecological restoration and novel ecosystems. Environmental Values26(1), 5-29.


Fellow: Hanna Mattila

Mattila, H. (2002). Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities?. GeoJournal58(2), 131-138.


Fellows: Stefano Moroni, Giuseppe Lorini

Moroni, S., & Lorini, G. (2021). Multiple functions of drawings. Journal of Urban Design26(3), 374-394.